Asset inventory
What equipment and facilities exist, where they are, what model they are, and what history they've built up. It's the foundation for everything else: without identified assets, there's no cost per equipment and no indicators.
Guide
What it actually does, what problems it solves, what advantages you can really expect, and how to choose one. No percentages nobody can back up.
A maintenance management software is the system where an organization records which assets it has to take care of, what gets done to them, who does it and with what. It's called CMMS, from Computerized Maintenance Management System, and in Spanish, GMAO, from Gestión del Mantenimiento Asistida por Ordenador. Both terms mean the same thing. Its job isn't to schedule tasks, any calendar can do that: it's to turn maintenance work into a per-asset history, because that history is the only thing that later lets you know what fails, what it costs and what to do about it.
Almost every organization keeps its facilities reasonably well maintained. What almost none of them can do is prove it, or explain why they spend what they spend. The work gets done, but it's recorded on paper forms that arrive late, in spreadsheets only the person who built them understands, and in the heads of two or three people with twenty years on the job. As long as everything's fine, it works. It stops working the day there's an inspection, the day a customer complains, the day those people retire, or the day management asks whether it's worth replacing a machine. A CMMS doesn't make maintenance happen better on its own: it makes sure it gets recorded in a way that can answer those questions.
The pieces you'll find in any serious product in this category.
What equipment and facilities exist, where they are, what model they are, and what history they've built up. It's the foundation for everything else: without identified assets, there's no cost per equipment and no indicators.
The basic unit: what needs doing, on which asset, who carries it out and what the result was. That's where hours, materials and evidence get recorded.
The recurring plans that generate orders on their own, with their frequency and their checks. It's what keeps you from depending on someone remembering.
The entry point for unplanned work: who reports it, about what, with what priority, and how it ends.
The material consumed during maintenance, with its stock and its cost charged to the order where it was used.
What has to be checked on each type of equipment. It's the difference between "checked" and "this, this and this were checked, with these readings".
Because maintenance happens on site, not in the office. If logging it means going back to a computer, it doesn't get done.
Cost per asset and per customer, preventive compliance, MTBF and MTTR. They're a consequence of everything above, never a substitute for it.
What you can genuinely expect. Be wary of anyone who gives you a figure without saying where it comes from.
It's the advantage most underrated when buying and most appreciated afterwards: during an inspection, a claim, or a contract renewal.
Real cost per equipment, per site and per customer, with labor and materials kept separate. It's what turns a hunch into a defensible decision.
Not because the software remembers better, but because whatever doesn't get done leaves a trace. A plan that's 60% complete and you know it is better than one you believe is 100% complete.
Work orders that don't need to be rewritten, reports that don't need to be assembled, and calls that don't need answering because the customer can see it themselves.
When the history lives in the system instead of one person's memory, staff turnover stops being a crisis.
Repair again or replace, grow the team or subcontract, renew a contract or drop it. With history behind you, those conversations change tone.
Leave your details and we will get in touch to see whether we fit. No commitment, no lock-in period.
Worth saying, because disappointment with these tools almost always comes from the wrong expectations. A CMMS doesn't reduce breakdowns by itself: a well-designed preventive plan that actually gets followed does that, and the software only helps with the second part. It doesn't fix a broken process, it digitizes it, so a messy workflow just becomes messy faster. It doesn't replace the technical judgment of whoever decides what to maintain and how often. And it doesn't produce good reports from poor records: if work orders get closed with "checked and working", no amount of analytics can save that. The practical rule is that the value of a CMMS is proportional to the quality of the records, and the quality of the records depends on recording being easier than not recording.
Six questions that separate the real products from the ones that just look similar in the catalog.
If the workflow comes locked in, you'll spend years translating your operation into someone else's model. It's the question that makes the biggest difference, and almost nobody asks it.
Ask what gets stored on the device, what actions can be done without a signal, and what happens if something fails while syncing. "Works offline" means very different things.
If it's per user, work out the cost with your entire team included, customers and subcontractors too. And keep in mind that per-license pricing pushes people to share accounts, which ruins the history.
Ask about the inventory: how it gets imported, how much detail it needs, and whether you can start with just part of it. It's the real blocker in most rollouts.
What you take with you, in what format, and how much effort it takes. Worth settling before you sign, not once you already want to leave.
A vendor who can't answer that either doesn't know their product or doesn't want you to. An honest answer is the best of all six signals.
Most CMMS deployments don't fail: they get abandoned, and almost always for the same three reasons. The first is wanting to build the full inventory before starting; four months in, nobody remembers the project. The second is configuring the workflow on the fly and having to change it with a thousand orders already inside. The third, and the most common, is training managers and not technicians, who are the ones who actually decide whether the system gets used. What works is the opposite: decide statuses and permissions before entering any data, start with one contract or one line with a minimal inventory, and support the field team through the first days with their own real work. Real orders running within weeks are worth more than a perfect inventory a year from now.
Yes. CMMS is the English acronym for Computerized Maintenance Management System and GMAO is the Spanish one for Gestión del Mantenimiento Asistida por Ordenador. They refer to the same category of product.
An ERP manages the business — billing, accounting, purchasing — and a CMMS manages maintenance: what assets exist, what gets done to them, by whom and with what materials. They're complementary, and it's common for them to integrate rather than one replacing the other.
A CAFM manages space: floor area, occupancy, desks and moves. "Facility management software" is a commercial umbrella term that means one thing, the other, or both, depending on who's using it. If your problem is not knowing what's been done at your facilities or what it costs, your problem is a CMMS problem.
It varies a lot depending on the pricing model, and that's the detail worth watching: many charge per user, which makes the cost grow with the team and pushes people to share accounts. When comparing quotes, always work out the cost with everyone who'll genuinely be using it included.
It depends less on size than on the number of assets and on whether you provide service to third parties. With five customers and a spreadsheet, you get by; with fifty, you don't. And as soon as you have to prove what was done to a customer or an inspector, size stops being the deciding factor.
It depends more on the state of your data than on the software. With a usable inventory, you can be up and running in weeks; if it has to be built up in the field, the sensible move is to start with one part and replicate it. Be wary of anyone who gives you a fixed timeline without having seen your case.
A short demo on your own operation answers more questions than any comparison, including this page.
Accessibility
Saved in this browser. Light or dark theme is set from the footer.