Multiple warehouses
The central one, each branch’s, and each technician’s van. Each with its own manager and its own stock.
Feature
A breakdown waiting on a part multiplies the cost of the downtime. And a warehouse full of material nobody uses is idle money. The middle ground is only found by knowing what actually gets consumed.
It’s the control of material consumed while maintaining: spare parts, consumables, expendable tools and installation material. It differs from a commercial warehouse in two ways. First, demand is driven not by sales but by breakdowns, so it can’t be planned with a sales forecast: it’s planned with the consumption history per piece of equipment. Second, cost doesn’t end at the purchase, because every part has to end up charged to the work order and the asset it was fitted to; otherwise there’s no real maintenance cost per machine.
Rarely all at once. Always the same causes.
Just enough for the data to keep itself accurate, without turning the warehouse into a separate job.
The central one, each branch’s, and each technician’s van. Each with its own manager and its own stock.
Material is charged from the work order itself, from the phone too. It’s the only moment the technician will actually record it.
For material that has one: sealants, oils, chemicals, gases. With its manufacturing date, its cost and its traceability.
Each item has its own threshold, so a shortage is caught before it’s needed, not when the technician is already on site.
Cost price and customer price per item, which is what lets you value a work order and know the margin on materials.
The technician requests material from another warehouse and the manager authorizes it. The movement is recorded, not a phone call.
Items grouped by family, with brand, model and the manufacturer’s original reference. That’s what stops the same part being created three times.
Items can come from the ERP so you’re not maintaining two separate masters of the same thing.
Leave your details and we will get in touch to see whether we fit. No commitment, no lock-in period.
Every warehouse system works fine in the first month. What decides whether it still works by month six is whether logging consumption is part of the job or an extra step. That’s why material is charged from the work order and from the phone, at the exact moment the technician closes what they did: if it means going back to the office and opening another screen, it doesn’t happen. The practical result is that the inventory no longer needs an annual general count to balance out again, and the cost of every job includes the real material rather than an estimate.
Once consumption is recorded, purchasing stops being a gut decision. Minimum stock flags what needs restocking, the history shows what each equipment type actually consumes, and the supplier order comes from that instead of a list written from memory. In operations with availability contracts, this also enables the opposite of what usually happens: instead of stockpiling everything just in case, you keep the critical part —the one that stops the line— on hand and drop the rest.
It goes back to stock, and that return is almost never logged. It’s one of the most frequent reasons the theoretical and real inventory stop matching: five parts get charged to the order, three get installed, and the other two go back to the van without anyone noting it. Making returns as easy as charging is what keeps the stock trustworthy over time.
What gets charged to work orders, which is usually less than it seems. Screws, consumables and small hardware create a disproportionate amount of control work for the value they carry, and end up discouraging the team without adding anything in return. What’s actually worth controlling is what has real price, what needs lead time to restock, and what can’t be missing when it’s needed — a much smaller and much more manageable set.
It’s the underlying problem of almost every maintenance warehouse, and it’s not solved with controls but with low friction: if charging a part from the phone takes two taps inside the job sheet the technician is already filling in, it gets charged. If it means opening another screen back at the shop, it doesn’t, no matter how many instructions are given.
Yes. You can define as many warehouses as needed —central, branch, van— each with its own manager and stock, and move material between them with a technician request and manager approval.
Yes, from the work order itself and even without coverage, like the rest of the technicians app. It’s what makes consumption actually get recorded instead of postponed.
Yes, for material managed by batch: each batch carries its code, manufacturing date, expiry date and cost, with traceability of which work orders it was consumed on.
Each item can have its own minimum stock, so the shortage is caught before a technician shows up on site without the part.
No. Items can be imported from the ERP through the available integrations, so the master stays a single one.
In the demo we’ll see how it would be organized and what it’d take for the stock to balance out without general inventories.
Accessibility
Saved in this browser. Light or dark theme is set from the footer.