That it was done on time
The record of each inspection with its date, compared against the required frequency. Missed ones count too, and it's worth having them on record.
Guide
The kind you don't choose. A regulation imposes it, with its own frequency and scope, and in an inspection what gets checked isn't whether it was done: it's whether you can prove it.
Legal maintenance — also called mandatory, statutory or regulatory maintenance — is the set of inspections an installation is legally required to undergo, with a frequency and scope that neither the owner nor their technical judgement decides. It differs from voluntary preventive maintenance in two ways: the date is set by the regulation, not by convenience, and there is an obligation to keep documentary proof that it was carried out. That second part causes the most problems, because the work usually gets done, but the record doesn't always.
It depends on the building's use, its size and the region. These come up almost every time.
Generally, the owner of the installation, even when the work is carried out by a contracted maintenance company. That distinction matters more than it seems and explains one of the most uncomfortable situations that come up in practice: a company that outsources its building's maintenance assumes responsibility has moved with the contract, and finds out during an inspection that it hasn't. The maintainer is responsible for carrying out what was contracted; the owner is responsible for the installation being compliant. That's why the calendar and the certificates should sit with the owner, not only in the supplier's system.
An inspection never asks "do you do it?" It asks "show me".
The record of each inspection with its date, compared against the required frequency. Missed ones count too, and it's worth having them on record.
What exactly was checked, point by point. "Checked and OK" proves no scope at all.
The maintenance company and, when the regulation requires it, the technician's accreditation valid on the date of the work.
The documents issued by the inspection or the control body, valid and locatable without having to reconstruct anything.
What has been done on that installation over time. It's what gets asked for when the question is about a specific piece of equipment.
Leave your details and we will get in touch to see whether we fit. No commitment, no lock-in period.
Almost never in execution. Inspections get carried out, because they're usually contracted and the maintainer does them. It fails in three specific places, always the same ones: the certificate that stays in the inbox of whoever received it, the frequency that slips by unnoticed until the following year, and the history that has to be rebuilt by hand every time someone asks. All three have the same cause: the proof lives apart from the work. When the inspection record and its documentation hang off the same asset, the inspection stops being a week-long project.
This is a general explanation and does not count as advice. Which regulation applies to you, with what scope and what frequency, depends on your installation, its use, its power or capacity and the region, and is determined by whoever has the technical and legal competence to do so. Frequencies also change as regulations are revised. If you need to know exactly what applies to you, the right answer comes from a qualified technician or the relevant authority, not from a website — not this one nor any other.
The owner of the installation, regardless of who carried out the inspection. It's a distinction that gets overlooked when maintenance is outsourced and is discovered too late: on the day of an inspection, or simply the day the maintainer changes, the documentation needs to sit with whoever is responsible for the installation, not in the archive of a company you no longer work with.
It depends on the installation, its power or capacity, its location and the regulation that applies to it, which is why there's no universal schedule that works for everyone. What is common to every case is the mechanism: someone with technical competence determines which inspections apply and how often, and from there they become periodicities planned well in advance.
It's useful for having everything located and showing what was done, when and by whom, which is normally what's asked for. What a system can't do is replace the certificates and reports issued by whoever has the competence to issue them: it stores them, links them to their installation and warns before they expire, but it doesn't generate them.
The set of inspections an installation is legally required to undergo, with a frequency and scope that the owner doesn't decide. Besides carrying them out, there's an obligation to keep documentary proof.
Generally the owner of the installation is liable, even when the work is carried out by a contracted company. The maintainer is responsible for carrying out what was contracted. That's why the calendar and the certificates should sit with the owner.
It depends on the building's use and size, but fire protection, thermal installations, low voltage, lifting equipment and legionella prevention come up almost every time. A qualified technician determines exactly what applies to you.
The record of each inspection with its date and scope, the certificates and reports issued, who carried it out and, when the regulation requires it, their accreditation valid on that date. And the history by installation, which is what gets asked for when the question is about a specific piece of equipment.
No, and be wary of anyone who claims it does. Compliance is the company's responsibility. What a system does is make sure inspections get planned on their own, carried out with a defined scope, and leave enough record to prove it.
In the demo we set up a couple of your mandatory inspections and see what would come up if someone asked for it today.
Accessibility
Saved in this browser. Light or dark theme is set from the footer.