Maintenance and service providers
Companies that provide service to others, with multiple clients, technicians on the road and contracts that need justifying.
Success stories
Meet some of our customers: how they started, what they use every day, and the different ways they've tailored the product to their operation, with real adoption data.
The norm in this industry is a grid of logos and three testimonials with a percentage next to them. Here there are logos, because our clients have authorized us to use them, but what matters is what's behind them: how each company started, how much work it runs through the system today, and the different ways it has tailored the product to its operation. You won't find savings percentages without an explanation of where they come from: a number without a starting point means nothing, and anyone who knows the field spots it right away. What you will find is real adoption data and, if you're interested, a phone number so you can ask someone who already uses it.
No names, but with enough detail to tell if you're a match.
Companies that provide service to others, with multiple clients, technicians on the road and contracts that need justifying.
Networks of dozens or hundreds of sites with external providers and a head office that needs to compare.
Operations with critical assets, preventive maintenance negotiated with production, and spare parts that can't run out.
Properties where the fault is detected by the guest and preventive work lives in the low season.
Scattered estate, several contractors per building and the obligation to justify spending.
More than sixty companies manage their maintenance with GMAO CLOUD today, with more than 2.8 million assets under management and more than 370,000 work orders logged during 2025. These are platform figures and we publish them because we can back them up. What you won't find is a generic savings percentage attributed to a client: those numbers depend so much on each operation's starting point that, without explaining the methodology, they mean nothing. If someone gives you one, ask how it was calculated.
Tell us in the demo or write to us: we look for a client with an operation similar to yours — same industry, similar size, similar problems — and ask if they'd mind talking to you. If they agree, we put you in touch and we don't take part in that conversation, which is the only way it's worth anything. It's slower than showing logos and considerably more useful: the questions you really want to ask — what it cost to roll out, what didn't work, what they'd do differently — don't get answered in a three-line testimonial.
Leave your details and we will get in touch to see whether we fit. No commitment, no lock-in period.
Published success stories have a structural problem: the vendor writes them, the client approves them, and neither has any incentive to mention what went wrong. That doesn't invalidate them, but it means you should read them through a filter. The first thing to look for isn't the results but the starting point: what did they have before, how many people, how many sites, what tool were they using. If that's missing, the case tells you nothing about whether it's similar to you. The second is to distrust round numbers with no origin: a thirty percent improvement without saying over what base and measured how means nothing. And the third, which is what really settles it: ask to talk on the phone with that company. A vendor that can't put you in touch with any client similar to you after several years in the market is telling you something, even if it doesn't say it outright.
If you get the call, there are four questions that pay off far more than asking for a general opinion. What was the hardest part of the rollout, which is where the truth comes out, because there's always something. How much of your own time it cost, beyond what you paid. What you've stopped using in the system, which reveals which parts sounded good but didn't fit. And what you'd do differently if you started today. None of the four are trying to catch anyone out: they're after the information a written case study can't give, because these are exactly the things a client will say out loud but won't put in writing. If the answers are specific and nuanced, the case is real. If they're enthusiastic and generic, the call gave you nothing.
We'll say so, which is more useful than forcing a comparison that doesn't hold up. And in that case the conversation that's actually worth having is the reverse one: looking at your operation together and pointing out which parts clearly fit, which would need adapting, and which would be out of scope. A poorly chosen reference sets the wrong expectations, and you pay for that during rollout.
The most useful route isn't a blind trial but a demo built around how you actually work: your assets, your clients and your preventive plans. An empty account with sample data shows you the interface and doesn't answer the only question that matters, which is whether it fits your operation.
There are operations with a small team and several sites, and others with a considerable workforce spread across several provinces. What determines fit usually isn't headcount but how the operation works: how many sites, whether the work is for third parties or in-house, and whether there are regulatory obligations involved.
Because a wall of brands doesn't answer the only question that matters, which is whether the product works for an operation like yours. We'd rather put you in touch with similar companies and let you have the conversation directly, without us there setting the pace.
Yes, and it's what we recommend most. We look for one with an operation similar to yours and ask if they'd mind talking to you. If they agree, we put you in touch and don't take part in the conversation.
We try. We look for a client with a similar operation and ask if they'd mind talking to you. If they agree, we put you in touch and don't take part in the conversation.
More than sixty, with more than 2.8 million assets under management and more than 370,000 work orders logged during 2025.
It depends so much on the starting point that any percentage without a methodology is noise. The honest approach is to look at it with your own numbers in a demo and, if you want a comparison, talk to someone who's already using it.
Tell us what you do and we'll look for someone with a similar operation who's willing to talk to you.
Accessibility
Saved in this browser. Light or dark theme is set from the footer.